MMPC-002 · June 2022 · English
IGNOU MMPC-002 June 2022 Previous Year Question Paper
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Structured previous year question paper for MMPC-002, June 2022 session.
Max marks: 100 · Questions: 11 · Sections: 3
Verified: 11 Sept 2026
MASTER OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION (MBA)/
MASTER OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION IN BANKING AND
FINANCE (MBF)
Term-End Examination
June, 2022
MMPC-002 : HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Time : 3 Hours Maximum Marks : 100
Weightage : 70%
Note :
(i) Attempt any three questions from
Section A. Each question carr ies
20 marks.
(ii) Section B is compulsory and carries
40 marks.
Section—A
Q1.What is Strategic Human Resource Management (S HRM) ? Discuss any two theories of SHRM and their applicability.
Q2.Discuss the salient features and methods of job analysis citing examples.
Q3.What is career planning ? Explain the process of career planning.
Q4.Write a descriptive note on the theories of trade unionism and their applicability in present day scenario.
Q5.Write short notes on any four of the following :
(a) Job Specification
(b) Artificial Intelligence and HRM
(c) Interview
(d) Critical Incident Techniques
(e) Incentives and Rewards
(f) Components of HRM [ 3 ]
Section—B
A global company with its headquarters in the
United States and business divisions all over the
world is very people oriented, and the parent
company is keen to implement as ma ny global
processes as possible, with customization to meet
country- and business -specific needs. There is, for
example, a global performance and development
planning scheme (appraisal) which occurs annually
at the same time across the branches worldwide.
Other processes have local (country and division)
components. Th e aim is to make management
processes as easy as possible; most of the support
material and process tracking is available online.
Across the board, the responsibility for managing
and developing staff is very muc h vested in local
managers : the HR departments do not have a
‘policing’ role. All activity is based on objectives
(organizational and divisional objectives cascaded
down the management to individuals). Individuals
are also responsible for their own develo pment as
much as their managers are and there is a wide
range of internal and external development
opportunities for those who want them (where they
are relevant to the job).
Levels of induction
The company’s induction practice in the UK is
about to chang e, partly due to feedback from staff
about induction and partly through a need to
communicate coherently at the organisational
(global) level following a merger. Induction has
three tiers. There is a global, online, Web -based
induction programme for all em ployees, which is
just about to be released following a period of
piloting. This has four elements : company
strategies, structures and processes, values and
behaviour, reward, and other ‘individual’ issues. At
the country (UK) level, a new induction day has
also started recently. This is particularly in
response to staff feedback. Although new starters
understood their role and place in the local
organisation, they were less clear about how the
different UK businesses fitted together and how
their role contributed to the UK -wide business as a
whole. New induction day is observed every 2 -3
months to bring together new recruits from across
the country along with the UK Director and Senior
Managers from the range of UK businesses. It is
called a Business and N etworking Orientation
Event. An interesting component is the ‘interview’ :
new recruits divide into small groups, each of which
interviews one of the senior managers and then
provides feedback to the rest (in front of the
managers) regarding what they have learned from
the interview. There is also a quiz (unchecked) that
aims to reinforce some of the learning from the day.
At the local level, each manager has a checklist
(available through the company intranet) which
they are prompted to use as soon as an
appointment has been accepted. The recruitment
and induction processes are therefore linked. The
checklist highlights things to do before the new
recruit arrives, such as ordering equipment, setting
up voicemail, what to do on the first day and
subsequently. This includes booking new staff on
the local health and safety induction, which is the
only part of the local induction not conducted by the
managers. New starters are also sent an e -mail
confirming their automatic booking on the UK
induction and highlighting things they must do as
in the first few weeks. It is very much the
manager’s responsibility to make sure that
induction is done effectively. There is no central
policing of whether the checklist is being complied
with. There is a very str ong philosophy in the
company that staff are managers’ responsibility.
HR will check attendance at the UK induction (but
there is no chec k on effectiveness). This is expected
to come through in per formance monitoring
processes (the performance planning pro cess).
Managers will set objectives for new staff usually
for a six month period, with regular reviews. Any
issues arising from an ineffective induction should
be highlighted as part of this. Any senior manager
can see the per formance plans and ratings of the
managers and staff in their divisions.
Performance planning process (appraisal)
There is no probation process as such, but short -
term objectives are set for the new staff, which are
fed into regular reviews and the annual
performance planning process a t the same time
across the entire organization. The scheme is
objective-oriented and results in a ‘rating’ which
indicates to managers what salary increase might
be applicable for the staff. The system is
automated, so that the previous year’s objectives
and development actions are brought forward for
Q6.review. If no progress has been made, the man ager has to explain this. Development actions in particular are the responsibility of both the manager and th e employee. Training or development needs identified ar e taken forward within the context of company -wide training and development programmes. There are core programmes, many of which are delivered over the Web, and specific business - related programmes, which are available for all staff and supported by the c entral budget. Any job - specific needs not covered by core pro grammes are met by courses or other activities paid for from the manager’s budget. The company uses a system of ‘job families’ with a guide to the development needed for each : there is an expect ation (but no compulsion) that employees will undertake the recommended training or development prior to moving up to a new level. Again, feedback and evaluation on the effectiveness of the performance planning pro cess is left to individuals and managers r ather than being part of any centrally driven activity . There is an employee comments section on each appraisal form, which is recorded. An open door policy is also followed, allowing any member of staff to refer to a senior manager if they are dis satisfied. Many of the Web -based programmes have been initiated by sta ff who have highlighted gaps in their own and their teams’ knowledge or understanding. Although a global company with global processes, the company’s philosophy is very much one of management re sponsibility for people and people development. Supporting frameworks, materials and processes are available —largely accessible via the company intranet—and are expected to be used. Trust must play a significant part. The online induction is interestin g and it would be good to revisit this in a few months to see what, if any, feedback there has been on its success. Similarly, the ‘interview’ component of th e UK-wide induction is worth nothing, particularly the commitment that this requires from senior manag ers to attend and participate effectively. What is most interesting its that, whilst many appare nty robust processes exist to support people management, it is the bottom line that is evaluated and measured (i.e., the success of the business and how well pe ople meet their objectives and contribute to business success) rather than the processes themselves; implementation of process es may sometimes become an end in itself in other organisations. Finally, the company does not have any external accreditations for people management and does not follow any external quality frameworks such as investors in People or EFQM, at least in the UK. Questions :
Q7.Critically examine the induction process and its role in placement of employees.
Q8.Do you think the three -tier induction would be enough for successful placement of employees ?
Q9.Can the localization of placement be improved ? If so, how ?
Q10.Does the performance planning have a role in placement ?
Q11.Critically examine the individualization of performance planning vis -à-vis centralization and its effectiveness in an organization.
MMPC-002 solved assignment & study guide
IGNOU MMPC-002 SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2026-27 IN ENGLISH (Human Resource Management)
View MMPC-002 solved assignment →